Hi Soren, I am not too sure about this. but here is a snip from the Gutsy Open Week logs about Loco teams
22:05 <@popey> < popey> QUESTION: Do you think that LoCos should become incorporated (in some way) in order to handle money (paying for space at venues, CDs, leaflets etc), or they should seek sponsorship - others to handle the money? 22:06 <@popey> (was the first question, but got skipped) 22:06 < atoponce> popey: that would depend on the team. if they feel that they cannot execute without it, then by all means, they should seek it. 22:06 < atoponce> i wolud advise to be careful in this area though 22:06 < H264> popey: I'd seek sponsership 22:07 < atoponce> it's easy to get distracted and caught up in the details of things like this, losing the greater goal 22:07 < H264> *sponsorship first 22:07 <@popey> that's all our questions On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Søren Bredlund Caspersen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > in the Danish LoCo team we are currently considering the possibility > of forming a 'formal' association, which would be a legal entity. This > would be done to enable the team to administrate money to pay for > posters, rent locations for release parties and so on. > > However some have mentioned that Canonical might have a problem with > this from a legal point of view (trademarks, etc.). So can someone > 'official' (Jono Bacon?) confirm or deny that? > > Regards > Søren Caspersen > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > -- Encryption Key (GPG PID): 19983D83 This has been an Eddie Martinez production. <Please exit in an orderly fashion>
-- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
