I don't want to be a pain, and if I'm interpreting the CC-BY-SA licence wrong, please correct me.
But I don't think a CC-BY-SA license is optimal for these graphics. If I understand the license correctly, every blog, forum post, wiki page etc. including these graphics, need to have a line informing who made the graphics. I can quickly come up with a hand full, if not more, pages that do include these graphics, but not the required attribution. I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but if the original author of the graphics felt that was the right license, should we not follow it? If it was really meant to be used in a way where attribution was not required, why not choose the right license from the start? Cheers Søren 2009/8/21 Leandro Gómez <[email protected]>: > 2009/8/21 Jono Bacon <[email protected]> >> >> On 08/21/2009 12:10 PM, Leandro Gómez wrote: >> > >> > Corrales to weave his magic? ;-) >> > >> > Yes indeed! Would anyone like to do these? Adolfo, could you ask Byron >> > >> > Made some badges based on Byron's artwork... threw in a couple of web >> > banners as well... download (including sources) here: >> > >> > http://www.mediafire.com/?gii7ghtym1y >> >> Those images look awesome! Good you attach them and add them to >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGlobalJam - thanks!* > > Done! :) > >> >> * >> Jono >> >> -- >> Jono Bacon >> Ubuntu Community Manager >> www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org >> www.identi.ca/jonobacon www.twitter.com/jonobacon >> >> >> -- >> loco-contacts mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > > -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
