On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dan Trevino <[email protected]> wrote: > Some of this may be duplicate data, but I agree with Diego, the > reality is the that data quality of the team reports is uneven. I > have no idea what tidbits of data Laura is trying to glean from our > info, but I'm also interested to see what kind of progress we're > making without having to check out a *bunch* of different wiki pages.
Since the monthly team reports are all wiki Includes on a wiki page anyway, I don't think there should be a problem with creating a bigger page covering, say, a year that just includes loco teams. So you'd have something like a page with: == February 2010 == === Philippine Team === <<Include(PhilippineTeam/TeamReports/10/February)>> === Russian Team === <<Include(RussianTeam/TeamReports/10/February)>> === South African Team === <<Include(ZATeam/TeamReports/10/February)>> == January 2010 == === Philippine Team === <<Include(PhilippineTeam/TeamReports/10/January)>> === Russian Team === <<Include(RussianTeam/TeamReports/10/January)>> === South African Team === <<Include(ZATeam/TeamReports/10/January)>> Etc. Then by encouraging teams to do monthly reports we'd have an easy way to compile a big list of *just* loco stuff, and the wider community would benefit from the team reports too with no extra work :) -- Elizabeth Krumbach // Lyz // pleia2 http://www.princessleia.com -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
