On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Søren Bredlund Caspersen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> wrote: >> Forgot to mention this (Thanks, Lyz!) >> >> If you need more information regarding the re-approval process, it's >> mostly outlined on the wiki[1]. If you need moreinfo or anything like >> that, please don't think twice about letting us know how we can help. >> >> [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/LoCoTeamReApproval > > So, I'm a bit confused, and I hope you can clarify. > The wiki page linked above mentions that the LoCo council will contact > the LoCo team. But as I read your mail below, the teams are to create > an application and send to the LoCo council and should not expect > direct contact from the council before doing this?
We filed bugs and subscribed the owner of the LP team. > Is the launchpad bug the LoCo councils way of contacting the team, or > should we sit tight and wait for a more formal mail from a member of > the Council? Yes. It is our way of getting in touch with you. If we were to mail you, it'd be just as form-letterish and inhuman as bug mail. > > Also, what is the advantage of marking the bug private? As I see it, > that only helps to move the process of re-approval from the entire > team, to the team contact. So that we (as the Council) can vote on it cleanly. We make them public after we vote. > > Cheers > Søren > > >> >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Good time of day, LoCo Teams! >>> >>> It's the time of year again! Re-approval time, so it's time dust off >>> the team photos and fire out some wiki edits! >>> >>> We have a *ton* of teams to review this year, so we have some ground >>> rules that need to be adhered to very closely. We really hate (and we >>> do) to be such a pedantic nit-picker, but it's to the point where we >>> can't (as the LoCo Council) slip on reviewing teams. Not good for you, >>> not good for us. >>> >>> All you team administrators have been subscribed to the LP bug, if you >>> are the contact (and not the admin), please contact your local >>> friendly admin (or one of us on the LoCo Council) to get subscribed. >>> >>> Here are the rules: >>> >>> * If the application is submitted before the release of Ubuntu >>> Oneiric, we will consider it. If it failes to come in on time, >>> we *will* have to throw it away. We're serious about this one. >>> >>> * We're looking for a few key things in particular this cycle. We >>> really want to see up-to-date Team Reports. It's really something >>> that needs to be enforced. We're also looking (as usual) for >>> outstanding and sustained levels of activity. >>> >>> * The sooner, the better! We really need to make sure we get to >>> everyone in a sane way, and that means that we're processing about >>> 2 applications a week. That's manageable, but not if everyone gets >>> them in the month before release. >>> >>> * By the way, we love you guys. We know you guys have >>> done awesome work so far, and we can't wait to see it! :) >>> >>> Let's get those apps in! >>> >>> Keep rocking! >>> Paul Tagliamonte >>> On Behalf of the LoCo Council >>> >>> P.S. >>> No extensions. We mean it! >>> >>> -- >>> All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. >>> >>> #define sizeof(x) rand() >>> :wq >>> >> >> Thanks! >> Paul >> >> -- >> All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. >> >> #define sizeof(x) rand() >> :wq >> >> -- >> loco-contacts mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >> > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > Paul -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq -- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
