On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:01 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > First let me say that I fully support the development of a respectful > > and logically consistent way to name LoCo teams. I am positive that as a > > group we can arrive at such a solution. Given that I do see some issues > > with the current suggestion put forth in the original email. > > Awesome. That's why it's an RFC and not a policy :)
A fantastic community driven and respectful way of doing things. I truly appreciate the effort that is being under taken here. Thanks to all. > > > > I would recommend including the use of the word 'state' for US States > > because this will help avoid conflicts such as: > > Howabout we add a clause allowing state in the case of conflict? I think that works very well. > > > > New York (the City) vs. New York (the state) > > Washington (the City) and Washington (the state) > > Kansas (the city) and (Kansas (the state) > > Iowa (the City) and Iowa (the state) > > I agree totally. > > [snip] > > > > > ---- suggestion ---- > > Allow the loco team to choose the name of their 'region'; which allows > > for New York State, Washington State, etc. > > That's fine, so long as it's consistent across the cases you mentioned > > > > > ---- clarification requested ---- > > Will previously grandfathered city locos be disbanded? (Chicago, Dallas, > > Vancouver) > > All the teams you've mentioned are really bad examples, because > they're all so fscking() awesome. > > We'll have to figure it out. For now, I'd say this is an edge-case > that can be resolved over time. I know Texas has some state-identity > issues, so we'll work through that as it comes up. I agree they are awesome teams and those cities have 'strong identities' as cities. > > > > Thanks, > > Charles > > > > > > For now, let's get a sane and consistent policy that works in 95% of > cases, and we'll work on the last 5% in a way that's sane later on. > > Love you all dearly, let's keep this great discussion up! > Well said Paul. Thanks, Charles
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
