On Jueves 30 Junio 2011 05:51:49 GatoLoko escribió: > El 29/06/11 23:37, Paul Tagliamonte escribió: > > Hi, Dmitry, > > > > This will be the subject of an upcoming LEP / RFC Mail, let's just > > focus on "true" LoCos, first > > > > All the best, > > Paul > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Dmitry Agafonov > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What about language-based loco teams? > > What about countries which code is shared for country AND language? > > Acording to that rule, the Spanish (as in country) community should be > "ubuntu-es", but the language code is "es" too, and the spanish team (as > in language) was created earlier, so they took "ubuntu-es" and then we > used agreed with the community manager to use "ubuntu-es-es" for the > country team. > > Should we change this according to the new rules or is our exception > still valid?
Gatoloko, Regarding ubuntu-es-es, maybe you can use ubuntu-esp? is less awkward and doesn't make it look like is a subgroup or subproject of ubuntu-es. For example, due to the namespace rules of IRC channels, #ubuntu-es-es falls into #ubuntu-es' namespace, but they are actually two different projects with different contacts. It can lead to confusion of which channel who is responsible of. -- ~ m4v https://launchpad.net/~m4v
-- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
