Hi folks, I think that "sponsored" is great :-)
2013/2/8 Elizabeth Krumbach <[email protected]> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Darcy Casselman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > My vote would be for calling it like it is: Sponsored. > > > > Anything that appears to confer special status or recognition ends up > with > > similar problems to "approved." > > > > It makes the pitch a lot easier too: "Go through our process and we give > you > > stuff. If not, coo'. Either way, keep spreading Ubuntu!" > > I've been following this thread all along, and this post is the one I > keep thinking of. This accurately describes my feelings too. > > I also would like to note, it hasn't just been Canonical who uses > "approval" as a mechanism for giving gifts, Prentice Hall used it as > the criteria for who they would send copies of the Official Ubuntu > Book to: > http://www.jonobacon.org/2011/07/05/free-official-ubuntu-book-for-approved-loco-teams/ > > -- > Elizabeth Krumbach // Lyz // pleia2 > http://www.princessleia.com > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > -- *Tiago Hillebrandt* Ubuntu Member Ubuntu Brazilian Community Council Member
-- loco-contacts mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
