Stickers are awesome. +1 stickers.  Everybody loves stickers.

Especially because they're much less likely to incur taxes, duties and
(especially) brokerage fees.

Darcy.


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Alexandru Cucu <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> An idea would be to have branded discs that we could write ourselves with
> the latest image. These could also be rewritable so users would be able to
> update them. Some manufacturers say that DVD-RW discs can be written about
> 10 000 times.
>
> Personally, I think stickers are better for spreading the word about
> Ubuntu. People almost never ask about discs these days.
>
>
> On 03/01/2013 07:43 PM, Bob Jonkman wrote:
>
>> I'm in favour of rolling releases, but because it'll mean a continuously
>> updated OS, not because it'll eliminate disks.
>>
>> Many people are running end-of-life versions of Ubuntu.  They had it
>> installed years ago, and now their computers need a release upgrade.
>> That's not a problem for most people on this list, but these are the
>> same people who had one of us install Ubuntu in the first place. Now
>> they need to bring in someone to do the upgrade. Rolling releases would
>> solve that problem.
>>
>> The branded disks are useful; they give some assurance that this is a
>> legitimate operating system, and not some pirated malware I've burned. I
>> carry a few disks around with me, and give them away at write-ins for
>> NaNoWriMo, LUG meetings, hackathons, &c. Passing out a burned disk
>> scrawled with a sharpie won't be accepatable, and those people aren't
>> going to have a thumbdrive with them that can be erased to make
>> bootable. For those people it's important that the disks be "live", so
>> that people can try Ubuntu without commitment.  Of course, if Canonical
>> were to distribute branded USB keys instead of disks that would be OK
>> too, but I don't think that removes the environmental concerns.
>>
>> I'm also recommending Ubuntu to people who have had problems with older
>> computers. Their version of Windows 98 has finally packed it in, but
>> their computers don't boot from USB and have no DVD.  For those a
>> NetInstall disk would work nicely, so that the latest rolling release is
>> installed immediately.
>>
>> So I hope Canonical changes to rolling releases, and also continues to
>> distribute disks or USB keys.  But I have no use for "marketing
>> materials" like pamphlets, flyers and booklets.  Buttons and stickers
>> would be nice, tho.
>>
>> --Bob.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13-03-01 11:03 AM, Pablo Rubianes wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to Randall marketing materials are better than Dvds as many LoCos have
>>> customs problems to pass the Dvds as the customs thinks we are going to
>>> sell them and dont let it inside the country.
>>> And nowadays get your iso from internet is quite easy, Dvds end up in a
>>> collection of Dvds from Ubuntu instead of install and pass the Dvd
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Pablo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/3/1 Randall Ross <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  On 13-03-01 06:50 AM, Alan Bell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> as you have probably seen there has been discussion opened up about
>>>>> having a rolling release between the LTS releases. My guess is that
>>>>> this means the approved LoCo teams would get a CD pack to distribute
>>>>> every two years rather than every 6 months. Anyone know if this is a
>>>>> good guess, and does anyone have an opinion on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally I am fine with that, it would be good to have a slightly
>>>>> bigger shipment of desktop DVDs every two years (I have no idea why we
>>>>> ever press the Server CDs) distributing them every 6 months is kind of
>>>>> inefficient, this way the LTS will have more long term relevance as a
>>>>> pressed DVD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I would like to see DVD media phased out totally, and the funds used
>>>> for
>>>> something that will help spread Ubuntu more quickly. (e.g. marketing
>>>> materials).
>>>>
>>>> In my experience free CD's/DVD's no longer help drive Ubuntu adoption. I
>>>> have also received comments from my local community about their negative
>>>> environmental impact and I share those concerns.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Randall.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> loco-contacts mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Alexandru Cucu
>
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts>
>
-- 
loco-contacts mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts

Reply via email to