Well, I think the Ohio team would be a good group to test with since our forum 
presence has been moribund in excess of 18 months.  I'm quite willing to 
consider an outright freeze & lock-down of what we've got on the forums in 
favor of a shift to discuss.ubuntu.com.

Stephen Michael Kellat, MSLS
Point of Contact/Leader, Ubuntu Ohio

On Sep 10, 2013, at 9:31 PM, "Jorge O. Castro" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> Over the past few months we've been playing around with a piece of
> software called Discourse: http://discourse.org
> 
> The idea is that discussion on the internet could use a reboot, and as
> a bonus, it's Free Software. So immediately we set up a prototype and
> started kicking the tires:
> 
> - http://ubuntu-discourse.org/
> 
> So far we've spent the last few months figuring out deployment issues,
> capturing best practice in the charms, and the sort of due diligence
> on what it would take to make this an Ubuntu resource available to
> all. We had a session at UDS and things are in motion to launch the
> site as discuss.ubuntu.com.
> http://ubuntu-discourse.org/t/uds-session-on-discourse/959
> 
> So what does this have to do with local teams? As it turns out
> Discourse needs a few things sorted out, mostly, how can it support
> nested categories? How can it scale? Well I've had some talks with the
> upstream project, the Forums Council, and the LoCo council and we feel
> that LoCo teams would be the perfect place to rock this. Here's what
> the LoCo section looks like:
> http://ubuntu-discourse.org/category/local-teams
> 
> And here's a currently empty example with Vancouver:
> http://ubuntu-discourse.org/category/ubuntu-vancouver
> 
> The idea would be to move interested LoCo teams that are NOT using the
> forums for support to Discourse. We would do this on a volunteer basis
> to see which teams are interested in driving this feature forward.
> Here's why I think $your_local_team should check this out.
> 
> - Nesting all the LoCo teams inside of a LoCo section is currently not
> implemented in Discourse, the volunteering teams would help drive
> feature development of this feature with upstream.
> - Since Discourse is Free Software this isn't just about your
> discussion forum, there are integration points we can do like
> integrated discussions on the loco portal, your loco blog, and even
> your individual member blogs. Think of Discourse as not only a forum
> but a Free Software replacement for Disqus comments as well allowing
> you to tie it all together in a hyperlocal location. To me this is a
> big opportunity, your Discourse category could be used to tie in
> different parts of your infrastructure together to help form a more
> cohesive community.
> - In light of all the discussion about reinvigorating teams; getting
> our teams on a slick modern discussion platform is a better way to
> engage with users instead of nerdy mailing lists. :)
> 
> Gotchas:
> 
> - Right now Discourse supports a "hybrid" model, of being a web
> discussion platform first with email integration. This wouldn't
> replace your existing team mailing list, though I would expect that
> some point in the future it would be one platform to handle
> everything. Replacing your team mailing lists isn't a near term goal.
> Though I suspect if your team is engaging with more non-geek users
> that they'll dig Discourse.
> - Migration - There isn't any from vbulletin to Discourse. Your team
> would have to make decision to freeze your old subforum on
> ubuntuforums.org and start fresh.
> - Multi-language support. We could do multiple languages but right now
> the software itself is deployed in English, and we'd have to deploy
> subsites for different languages to give native languages in the
> software itself and so forth. Given the maturity of the site I'd like
> to punt this to a later goal; I think for now having native languages
> in the LoCo category itself is fine, and we can work out the details
> about translating the UI later.
> - We've obviously not launched the site in production as
> discuss.ubuntu.com, this is ongoing.
> 
> We don't really know what this would look like in the software, the
> idea is to get interested teams signed up, and then get you working
> with the Discourse folks to kick the tires; we then iterate quickly.
> 
> So with that, I'm looking for a few gutsy teams who want to help form
> and drive our future discussion platform .... discuss!
> 
> -- 
> Jorge Castro
> Canonical Ltd.
> http://juju.ubuntu.com/charm-championship - Share your infrastructure,
> win a prize!
> 
> -- 
> loco-contacts mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts

-- 
loco-contacts mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts

Reply via email to