Hello,

I was playing around with the cvs HEAD and saw the hints of APR dependencies,
so decided to join the mailing list and join the discussion.

I personally would vote against using APR.  Or better stated I would prefer to
keep the logging library as dependency-free as possible.  Ideally the use of
APR could be conditionally compiled in, but I'd like to see a flexible, small,
fast, and stable logging library.

To that note I've started poking around to allow finer granularity on the msvc
side of builds -- allowing to opt out of winsock dependent functionality by
using a HAVE_NET in config_msvc.  Again my primary goal is to keep the library
size small for my application where distribution size is critical.

Mark

Reply via email to