Hi, I'm still alive;-) And yes - I would like to help. I once signed and faxed already a CLA (if I remember right I used another e-mail-address [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I was busy in other projects, but I can spend more time for log4cxx now. I would love to see aa active c++-logging library and log4cxx is the best I have seen. Tommi Am Freitag, 29. April 2005 20:42 schrieb Curt Arnold: > On Apr 29, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Ceki G�lc� wrote: > > The 3+ active committer should not come as a surprise. Having 3+ > > active committers has always been a requirement for graduation. There > > are numerous discussions of this rule in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing > > list. The Incubator PMC made several remarks regarding log4cxx's > > committer base when we asked for its graduation. The went along under > > the assumption that the committer base eventually seek to increase the > > number of committers. > > > > Why don't you start by nominating the current developers, namely > > > > Andreas Fester > > Ingo L�tkebohle > > Daniel Einspanjer > > Christopher Smith > > Tommi M�kitalo > > > > Given the liberal nature of the Contributor License Agreement, it is > > rarely (if ever) a hurdle. > > I definitely could be concerned if I had to take the CLA to my > employer's legal department. Especially if I felt that I needed to > have my employer sign off on a Corporate CLA. > > I tried to list everyone who has contributed a non-trivial patch since > JIRA was started. I did not attempt to filter the list by whether the > developer was currently active on the mailing list or make any judgment > whether I would support them as a committer. Barring special > circumstances, the next log4cxx committer would likely come from the > universe of people who have submitted patches. > > If they have no current interest in contributing to log4cxx, it does > the project no good to promote an inactive developer to an inactive > committer. > > If the individuals don't respond to this thread in the next few days, > I'll send personal emails to follow up. But unless someone is > interested and can sign the CLA, there is no reason to call a vote on > them. > > Lets say by next Friday, I will either nominate one or more people or > given an explanation to the PMC.
