Matthew Campbell wrote: > UGH your right mine says, its been a while so I probaly just forgot > that I changed it. It seems log4cxx is rough around the edges > sometimes. > > DECLARE_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy) > Double checked svn head, and your right it says > DECLARE_ABSTRACT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy)
I dont see any reason why TimeBasedRollingPolicy should be declared as "abstract" class. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-131 Fix is now in SVN head. Regards, Andreas > > On 3/15/06, Rainer Schuetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I changed the declaration of the TimeBasedRollingPolicy as >>- DECLARE_ABSTRACT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy) >>+ DECLARE_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy) >>and the logger works fine for me. >> >>Is the CVS not Up-to-Date or what is the reason to declare >>TimeBasedRollingPolicy as abstract? >> [...]
