Hi,
I wont feel happy about it. log4cxx is based
on APR, and the dependency on apr-iconv was
removed some time ago but we still use the apr_xlate
functions. Moving those back to apr-iconv would
put an additional burden on people who want to compile
the log4cxx library.
So, if there is not a really really good reason: please
do not do it :-)
Thanks,
Andreas
PS: CC'd to log4cxx-dev for informational purpose.
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What do you guys think of this email subject?
> IMHO it would make an additional requirement
> for the unix builds of httpd, but windows is
> dependent on it anyhow.
>
> OTOH, the xlate would go to it's proper place,
> because it is a part of apr-iconv.
>
> The reason is simple. If someone needs xlate
> stuff, then he will use apr-iconv. The apr-util
> will in that case become really apr only dependant,
> which is not the case right now.
> Since apr-iconv is dependent on apr and apr-util,
> while (now) apr-util is dependent on apr-iconv
> (only on windows) this makes sense thought.
>
> Regards,
> Mladen.
>
