On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:20:50AM -0600, Curt Arnold wrote: > > On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Bob Rossi wrote: > > >Attached is a patch that correctly allows the autotools to find the > >cppunit installation when it is installed in a non standard place. > > > >BTW, is this list active? Is log4cxx active? It would be great if > >someone could tell me they are at least noticing the diffs I've > >sent in, > >even if they can't get to them for a while. > > > >Thanks, > >Bob Rossi > > > > > It is better to use JIRA to record patches (http://issues.apache.org/ > jira. It makes things easier on the developers since all code > changes should be associated with JIRA issues and patches are much > more likely to be noticed during bug killing sprees if they are in > JIRA instead of depending on the developers to go back through the > mailing list to find issues there. > > The following two issues address MinGW related issues with log4cxx: > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-74 > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-116 > > BTW: It is also good to use separate posts for separate topics since > it make it easier to follow topics in the archives. As for the > "active" part, the log4cxx-dev list is archived at several places > (see http://logging.apache.org/site/mailing-lists.html) which makes > it fairly easy to check the activity of the list yourself plus you > are getting fairly timely responses when you ask a question.
OK, well, should I submit both of the patches I made to JIRA? BTW, I was able to get past both of those problems comiling log4cxx with mingw. I have successfully made a build, and ran the testsuite. Bob Rossi
