Hi. We are also using log4cxx in one of our products and we are currently migrating this product from a 32-bit to a 64-bit platform. I am very excited to see what impact that will have on log4cxx. If our tests fail we can always try to run those applications in 32-bit mode. We are using version 0.10.0.
So basically, we still need log4cxx and would like to see more activity around the development, but i understand fully that for that you must have people that have time and interest. And as I myself do not have time I cannot make other people prioritise it either. So.. Just a message to say that it's in use here too.. Best Regards, Tomas Andersen Senior Consultant +47 91 87 32 77 [cid:D8FEA1FF-E055-413B-A9C7-80D4D1EF4659] Tønne Huitfeldts Plass 2 | N-1767 Halden | NORWAY www.morecom.no <www.morecom.no> Disclaimer: This e-mail is bound by the terms and conditions described at www.morecom.no/mail-disclaimer.html <http://www.morecom.no/mail-disclaimer.html> From: chand priyankara <ch...@engineering.com<mailto:ch...@engineering.com>> Reply-To: Log4CXX Dev <log4cxx-dev@logging.apache.org<mailto:log4cxx-dev@logging.apache.org>> Date: Thursday, February 7, 2013 10:19 AM To: Log4CXX Dev <log4cxx-dev@logging.apache.org<mailto:log4cxx-dev@logging.apache.org>> Cc: Logging General <gene...@logging.apache.org<mailto:gene...@logging.apache.org>> Subject: Re: Moving log4cxx to the Attic We are using this library, a lot. This is kind of a well stable product, and seems small amount of changes,enhancements. So it seems inactive, but NOT. Some custom appenders been developed, but not in code base. i feel, we cant consider this as dead. :( regards, Chand Priyankara [Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/chand.priyankara> [LinkedIn] <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/chandpriyankara> [Blogger] <http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com/> [Google Plus] <http://plus.google.com/104246340732624023499> |BSc(Eng) - Electrical & Information |(094) 773-361-566 |ch...@engineering.com<mailto:ch...@engineering.com> |http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com<http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com/> [http://images.wisestamp.com/apps/causes/wwf_banner.png]<http://www.iucnredlist.org/amazing-species>sent via internet On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Alexandru Zbârcea <zbarce...@wizant.com<mailto:zbarce...@wizant.com>> wrote: We use log4xx extensively ... There are few changes I wanted to push, but I had no time ... On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Andrew Lazarus <dr...@me.com<mailto:dr...@me.com>> wrote: It's doing everything I want! So I haven't had any need to develop further. On Feb 06, 2013, at 09:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com<mailto:grobme...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello I would like to propose we move the log4cxx component to the attic. I am not sure if the Apache Attic itself is the right place: http://attic.apache.org/ as it seems to feed on TLDs only. I will ask there, if we agree that log4cxx is not really maintained and that there will no work happen in future. I have hoped that there were a couple of people coming back to the project when they see somebody is committing their patches. But it hasn't happened and my own C skills are not enough to push this (time is an issue too). In case we agree, I would like to to keep the old log4cxx website, saying this project is not longer maintained and the source code has been moved to attic (if the attic.apache.org<http://attic.apache.org> would take it). Other options are also welcome, just let me hear what you think. Best regards, Christian -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
<<inline: 70DDC713-F68A-406A-A9F1-088FA295BFC3.png>>
