I am probably willing too. I just currently don't know what I would be promising.
Joseph Southwell jos...@southwell.org The past is history, The future's a mystery, The present's a gift. On Dec 30, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Thorsten Schöning <tschoen...@am-soft.de> wrote: > Guten Tag Rhys Ulerich, > am Montag, 30. Dezember 2013 um 16:04 schrieben Sie: > >> Agreed. Have a preference for the branch name for the development >> line? No logging convention jumps out at my from looking at, e.g., >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/log4j2/branches/. > > I would go with log4j and use version specific names, like 0.11.2, > 0.12.0, 1.0.0 etc. > >> Once https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7092 closes, should >> we start with getting that 0.11.0 release branch made from src on >> carnold's last commit? > > Yes. > >> If so, anyone want to take lead there when the >> time comes? > > I would give it a try, but I would focus on formalism alone and > wouldn't test anything myself. I currently simply don't have the > environment to do so and in my opinion any real development should go > into 0.12.0. Your linked examples of the release process contain > statements about tests, so would it be ok to just ignore those things? > From my point of view releasing the current status of the code with > all the patches applied would be a reasonable goal. > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > > Thorsten Schöning > > -- > Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de > AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ > > Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 > Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 > Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 > > AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln > AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
