Hi, What you really mean by '~restrict'? Is it for some recent releases, or just like forever?
And whats the actual root cause to get in to this kind of a problem? regards, *Chand Priyankara* [image: Facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/chand.priyankara> [image: LinkedIn] <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/chandpriyankara> [image: Blogger] <http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com/> [image: Google Plus]<http://plus.google.com/104246340732624023499> |BSc(Eng) - Electrical & Information |(094) 773-361-566 |ch...@engineering.com |http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com <http://www.iucnredlist.org/amazing-species>sent via internet On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Pedro Lamarão <pedro.lama...@prodist.com.br > wrote: > Em 11/01/2014 10:03, Florian Seydoux escreveu: > > Hi all, >> a short question: do wee all agree to ~restrict the codebase to ansi C++ >> (ie. -std=c++98) without 03/11 extension? >> (despite it's not enforced on gcc compilation) >> >> > There are no 2003 extensions. > ISO C++ 2003 is the same as ISO C++ 1998 with the incorporation of various > errata. > > Perhaps you are worried about Visual C++ 6. > It doesn't and could never fully support ISO C++ 1998 or ISO C++ 2003, > because it was released before those standards were completed. > Is this the case? > > P. >
