Guten Tag Florian Seydoux, am Dienstag, 28. Januar 2014 um 06:21 schrieben Sie:
> Just to recall, the idea is to publish a 0.11.0, with almost the content > of a 0.10.1? +1 ...or whatever is "easy" to implement for a 0.11.0, whether or not it has been scheduled for a 0.10.1. > I remember we had discussion regarding the repository (branches vs > trunk), without clear outcome on some policy: do we need to makes now > a (pre-)release branche, in order to freeze the codebase, only > "accepting" major bug fixes and documentation? or do we just continue > with the trunk till the next release? There seem to be quite some bugs wich already provide solutions or patches which seem to only need to be applied, therefore I would first schedule all those bugs to the pending 0.10.1 and apply them afterwards directly on trunk. After all bugs are closed we could branch the trunk as 0.11.0 and test "somehow". This way trunk benefits from all the fixes provided in the last years and we don't need to merge back ti much from a 0.11.0 branch. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
