Christian, Thanks for the response. There's also a discussion on general@ to figure out what's going on. Not sure if you can provide some input there.
I have a feeling that the marvin reports went to your podling, but ended up in moderation limbo. Can you please review? John On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John > > thanks for asking. > > Log4cxx was an established subproject of Apache Logging Services. We have > then realized that there were no more active committers and considered the > attic for it. However some community members (but non-committers) were > opposed to the attic. The idea was then to move the code base to the > incubator and see how it would go. > > To avoid wasting infra resources, there were no objections from the IPMC > to just "stick" with what we have, aka domain, ml and so on. After all, the > IP is already clean. > > So far it looks like the only missing requirement to exit is the release: > log4cxx community is still small, but we have a bigger community over in > Logging land. So it would not be an issue to make votes pass (or not) and > keep an oversight, as we have done it before. > > Hope that clarifies. > > Thanks! > > Christian > > -- > Christian Grobmeier > grobme...@gmail.com > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014, at 03:31, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi > > It seems like the log4cxx2 podling isn't matching expected incubator > guides. Why isn't your podling using i.a.o domains? > > >
