Thank you very much for your suggestions. Now I could build log4cxx on solaris successfully. But when I try to run a sample example 'trivial' (in src/exapmles) I get the following error. It just has BasicConfigurator.
--------
You have tried to set a null level to root.
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
--------
 
Any ideas please... I am using log4cxx-0.9.7 version. Do I need to supply any configuration file or set any environment variables. I tried to set log4j.configuration environment variable. But it does not take this as it has '.' (dot) in it. Has anyone come across this problem?
 
Thanks,
Surekha.

"Sven A.Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This might be unrelated, but I've had loads of trouble with linking
STL/template code on Solaris. Using the compiler switch
"-instances=static" fixed all my problems. Found here:



HTH,
Sven


On 31.08.2004, at 19:42, Surekha Guntur wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> I am trying to build log4cxx on Sun solaris and I am getting following
> problems. I have used following following flags for configure script.
>  
> ./configure CC=CC CXX=CC CXXFLAGS="-g -mt -KPIC -xarch=v8plus"
>  
> Following are the errors I get while doing 'make'. There are many
> undefined symbols similar to these. Can somebody please help me on
> this.
>  
> ild: (undefined symbol)
> log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT> ector>&log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT> RepositorySelector>::operator=
> (const __type_1&) --
> referenced in ../
> src/.libs/liblog4cxx.so
> ild: (undefined symbol) void
> log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT> ct>::cast(const __type_1&) --
> referenced in ../sr
> c/.libs/liblog4cxx.so
> ild: (undefined symbol)
> log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT> nverter>&log4cxx::helpers::ObjectPtrT> PatternConverter>::opera
> tor=(const
> __type_1&)
>  -- referenced in ../src/.libs/liblog4cxx.so
> *** Error code 5
> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `simplesocketserver'
> Current working directory /csf/csf/w951bdz/log4cxx/log4cxx-0.9.7/src
> *** Error code 1
> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all-recursive'
>  
> Thanks a lot,
>  
> Surekha.
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Reply via email to