It's hard to tell yall apart! http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ http://log4cpp.sourceforge.net/ http://log4cplus.sourceforge.net/ http://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/
I will try log4cxx - sounds like what I wanted in the first place. owen "Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > However, this is not the log4cpp project > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/log4cpp/) and not the right forum to > ask questions about building their project. It appears that they just > had a release in the last few weeks, so there should be someone on one > of their mailing lists. > > Is there some feature or capability that makes you prefer log4cpp over > log4cxx? Can't do anything if you don't like the ASF license however. > > > > On May 3, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Owen Corpening wrote: > > > there are no xml files in the entire directory tree, I don't think > > they use > > "ant" they use make and configure. > > > > The readme says to use the visual studio to build the project which I > > did, > > and it built. > > > > besides the cli would be useful to know > > > > owen > >
