UGH your right mine says, its been a while so I probaly just forgot
that I changed it. It seems log4cxx is rough around the edges
sometimes.
DECLARE_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy)
Double checked svn head, and your right it says
DECLARE_ABSTRACT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy)
On 3/15/06, Rainer Schuetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I changed the declaration of the TimeBasedRollingPolicy as
> - DECLARE_ABSTRACT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy)
> + DECLARE_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy)
> and the logger works fine for me.
>
> Is the CVS not Up-to-Date or what is the reason to declare
> TimeBasedRollingPolicy as abstract?
>
> Regards
> Rainer
>
>
>
> Rainer Schuetze schrieb:
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > I'm also using the CVS head from
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4cxx/trunk
> > My current Version is: Revision 386095.
> > I'm running Log4CXX on XP with the msvc compiler 6.0.
> >
> > I've checked out the current Version and tried it again with your
> > configuration, but failed. The new instance couldn't be created by the
> > classLoader, the TimeBasedRollingPolicy is declared abstract.
> > I have no idea why the TimeBasedRollingPolicy works fine on your computer.
> > I've found a mailing from Iwan Tomlow at:
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.logging.log4cxx.user/day=20050803?set_blog_all=yes#
> >
> > which had the same problem.
> >
> > Regards
> > Rainer
> >
> > Matthew Campbell schrieb:
> >
> >> I'm using the timebased rolling policy fine with CVS head from like
> >> January(tarball on the website won't work) here is what I used. Yeah
> >> and only the XML based configuration can use the timebasedrolling
> >> policy took me a while to figure that out :(
> >>
> >> <appender name="main" class="org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender"
> >> append="false">
> >> <rollingPolicy class="org.apache.log4j.TimeBasedRollingPolicy">
> >> <param name="FileNamePattern" value="lobbyserver.%d.log"/>
> >> </rollingPolicy>
> >>
> >> <layout class="org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout">
> >> <param name="ConversionPattern" value="%d{%y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S}
> >> [%5t] %5p %c - %n%m%n%n"/>
> >> </layout>
> >> </appender>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/15/06, Rainer Schuetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I've tried to get the TimeBasedRollingPolicy running. So I was wondering
> >>> why the DOMConfigurator couldn't create an Instance for the
> >>> TimeBasedRollingPolicy.
> >>>
> >>> I've debugged my App step by step and figured out, that the
> >>> TimeBasedRollingPolicy was declared as an Abstract class. What is the
> >>> reason for this?
> >>> However, I changed the the declaration:
> >>> //DECLARE_ABSTRACT_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy)
> >>> DECLARE_LOG4CXX_OBJECT(TimeBasedRollingPolicy)
> >>> and failed at the Date pattern. In the jDOC, the example is
> >>> documented as:
> >>> <param name="fileNamePattern" value="./log/test1-{yyyy-MM}"/>
> >>> but I needed to mark the pattern as a date with [%d]:
> >>> <param name="fileNamePattern" value="./log/test1-%d{yyyy-MM}"/>
> >>> At the current state of Log4CXX, the Date format pattern is required.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>> Rainer
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Rainer Schuetze
> >>>
> >>> i3mainz - Fachhochschule Mainz
> >>> Holzstrasse 36
> >>> 55116 Mainz
> >>> Germany
> >>>
> >>> Tel: +49 (0)6131 2859 682
> >>> Fax: +49 (0)6131 2859 699
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> http://www.i3mainz.fh-mainz.de
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> If video games influenced youth, all the kids who played Pac-Man would
> >> spend all their time walking around in dark rooms listening to
> >> electronic music and munching on magic pills.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Rainer Schuetze
>
> i3mainz - Fachhochschule Mainz
> Holzstrasse 36
> 55116 Mainz
> Germany
>
> Tel: +49 (0)6131 2859 682
> Fax: +49 (0)6131 2859 699
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.i3mainz.fh-mainz.de
>
>
--
If video games influenced youth, all the kids who played Pac-Man would
spend all their time walking around in dark rooms listening to
electronic music and munching on magic pills.
