Hi Mark, I call log4cxx::LogManager::shutdown() before the program terminates. Besides there are some other issues with memory leaks under Win32. Check out the following for patches too.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-140 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-117 Greetz, Chris > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Juli 2006 19:29 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Usage and VC 7.1 debugger memory leaks > > Hello, > > I have found a few threads in the archive about memory leaks > reported by various versions of the MSVC debugger. None of > these threads have contained any resolution that helps me > with my problem. > > My problem occurs due to the way I am using the LoggerPtr, so > really what I am looking for is suggestions on how to do it > without causing these leaks (or if there is some reason I > don't need to worry about them). > > I realize the common usage is to use a static instance in > each class that uses logging and name the logger after the > class. If I do it this way, it works without the reported > leaks. The problem is I do not want to do this, because I > don't want to have to change more than one class if I decide > to change logging mechanisms. > > So I am trying to use a singleton wrapper class. > > The relevant characteristics of this class are: > > 1. Private constructor, public method to get an instance. > > 2. Static member for log4cxx declared as follows: > > In header: > > static log4cxx::LoggerPtr logger; > > In implementation file: > > log4cxx::LoggerPtr > USTLogger::logger(Logger::getLogger("MyLogger")); > > ------------------------------------------- > > I am linking the shared log4cxx.lib in another shared .lib > that is linked into my .exe > > Just creating the logger as above results in the "leaks" > (i.e. whether I send anything to the log or not). > > I tried explicitly releasing the LoggerPtr by calling > releaseRef() when my singleton is destroyed for good, but > that caused an access violation. > > Does anyone have any suggestions/thoughts on this? > Specifically what is the best way to construct a wrapper > class for use with log4cxx? > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection > around http://mail.yahoo.com >
