Could you test using log4cxx::Level::getDebug() instead of
log4cxx::Level::DEBUG? The static members DEBUG, INFO, etc are held
over from 0.9.7 and log4j however non-local static member variables
are problematic at best. I believe that DEBUG et al are marked as
deprecated for that reason. I've been tempted to remove them
entirely but that would probably warrant a vote to see how many
people would be affected.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:02 AM, Salvati Marc wrote:
Hello,
I m using QThread and Log4cxx in a project. I created a simple
class with static member to access logging anywhere in my soft.
But when I m accessing from another thread I have some kind of
random crash.
I tested without multithread and it work fine.
It s written in Log4cxx Faq that it s Thread safe. Am I wrong to
use class static members or is there a bug in the thread safe
functionnality? Is it problem to use QT Qthread with log4cxx?
Thank you for any kind help.
Best regards.
here the class declaration, initialization, and log sample.
//my class
class Log{
public : static log4cxx::logstream stream;
static log4cxx::LoggerPtr logger;
};
//initialization
log4cxx::LoggerPtr Log::logger(log4cxx::Logger::getLogger("Logger"));
log4cxx::logstream Log::stream(Log::logger, log4cxx::Level::DEBUG);
//logging sample
Log::stream<<"message"<<LOG4CXX_ENDMSG;
