Wow! I work in a Windows environment. Are there any instructions on build and test?
Thanks, An -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:25 AM To: Log4CXX User Subject: RE: Most stable version of log4cxx? Stephen - Very good question... I have an offshore dev team who may be able to throw in some time testing, assuming there are **documented** tests to run. They are definitely not too good on "ad-hoc" style testing. Regards, Renny Koshy President & CEO -------------------------------------------- RUBIX Information Technologies, Inc. www.rubixinfotech.com "Stephen Bartnikowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To rkinglizards.com> "'Log4CXX User'" <[email protected]> 12/06/2007 09:58 cc AM Subject RE: Most stable version of log4cxx? Please respond to "Log4CXX User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ging.apache.org> Hey Curt, What's the testing process? How do we the users get involved on that and what sort of committment do we need to make? I think it's important I eke out some testing time out of my schedule to help out on that front, since, hey I'm using developer builds of log4cxx on FreeBSD, openSUSE, SUSE Enterprise, Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise, White Box, and I want to bring it over to Mac OS X Server. As for the voting process, is there a process there too? Do we need to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to participate? Thanks for the update! - Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 6:27 PM To: Log4CXX User Subject: Re: Most stable version of log4cxx? On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I know... I wish I could personally contribute time/energy/ > resources... > during the project in question we actually hired both omniEvents > developers full time to 'help out'... but am not in a position right > now. > > Would putting a "bounty" on it incentivise anyone to help? > > Renny Koshy > President & CEO > I think we are close enough that getting a new developer ramped up would likely delay things unless someone wants to take on the ODBC/ DBAppender in the next week or so. However, having a configure/ autotools guru on call could be helpful. Andreas Fester has done that role in the past and I was planning on nagging him when doing the release candidate preparation. Testers checking various build platforms and testing with apps that use log4cxx 0.9.7 however would be very helpful and timely votes on any release candidates would be essential to encouraging the LS PMC to support the release.
