Guten Tag Peter Westman, am Donnerstag, 27. Oktober 2016 um 11:11 schrieben Sie:
> My suggestion is to have getInfo return a const Level& instead of a > LevelPtr. But that would change the interface and "everyone" would need to change things. On the other side, "const Level*" would at least be compatible with the current invocation of LevelPtr on the caller side, but would fail assignments and such as well. So, break back compatibility and if so, with which form? I don't use Levels in my codebase, so I'm fine with such a break. ;-) Additionally I would prefer "const Level&" as well. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
