ceki 2002/06/28 02:19:23 Modified: docs SUMMARY Log: Fixed spelling mistakes. Revision Changes Path 1.2 +9 -9 jakarta-log4j/docs/SUMMARY Index: SUMMARY =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-log4j/docs/SUMMARY,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- SUMMARY 28 Jun 2002 09:09:11 -0000 1.1 +++ SUMMARY 28 Jun 2002 09:19:23 -0000 1.2 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ This file contains the summary of what has been discussed on the -log4j-dev@ mailing lists. Its mothly contents are sent to the editor +log4j-dev@ mailing lists. Its monthly contents are sent to the editor of the Jakarta Newsletter. For the first issue of the Jakarta Newsletter see: @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ +==========+ The month started with a question by John Armstrong [1] on whether -log4j offered any guaratees on binary compatibility between various +log4j offered any guarantees on binary compatibility between various versions. To which Ceki replied by stating [2] the current policy of not removing deprecated methods until at least two release cycles are complete. This reply did not seem to satisfy John Armstrong and in a @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ importance of the decimal character separator. Possible performance improvements were also suggested. Mark Womack submitted code for timezone support for date elements of pattern layout. Unfortunately, -the the code was anonymous and we could not take into consideration. -The idea seemed to catch on though. +the code was anonymous and we could not take into consideration. The +idea seemed to catch on though. [4] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=102209832808942&w=2 [5] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=102420694310844&w=2 @@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ [6] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=102326443025158&w=2 [7] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=102327620700816&w=2 -Costin Manolache related his experiece [8] with confuring log4j with -JMX. He mentioned the web-application logging insulation problem. In -response, Ceki wrote a specification [9] for solving the logging -separation problem. This was followed by a promising discussion [10] -on Tomcat-dev. +Costin Manolache related his experience [8] with configuring log4j +with JMX. He mentioned the web-application logging insulation +problem. In response, Ceki wrote a specification [9] for solving the +logging separation problem. This was followed by a promising +discussion [10] on Tomcat-dev. [8] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-dev&m=102412323003656&w=2 [9] http://qos.ch/containers/sc.html
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
