Patrice,
Sounds like a worthy addition. Documentation never hurts unless it is out
of sync with the code. Will you agree to maintain the UML diagrams if and
when the code structure changes? Cheers, Ceki
ps: There is no UML diagrams for log4j. I used to have access to Rational
Rose (put "I am going to throw up" sign here) but that is no longer the case.
At 17:49 30.01.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi,
>I have recently discovered log4j and started to study its architecture a
>bit more closely.
>One of the things i've been trying to do is sketch out the UML Class
>Diagram for the core
>components of log4j. However, i was curious to know if this has already
>been done by the
>authors of log4j as it would allow me to compare my model to it. If so, I
>think it would
>definately be worthwhile to include it on the project website.
>Cheers,
>P.C.
----
Ceki Gülcü - Independent IT Consultant
av. de Rumine 5 Tel: ++41 21 351 23 15
CH-1005 Lausanne e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
Switzerland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
