I'm glad to see that Velocity will be able to change. I agree with Anders
that in the future we should practice deprecating a log4j interface before
entirely removing it. Since log4j is more like a library than an
application, any change in any interface has the potential to break someone
out there.
I think it would be safer for velocity to link to a static version of log4j
rather than to whatever is reflected in the latest CVS source tree. This
would provide for a more orderly transition between versions and allow the
log4j developers to prepare a list of changes and their implications.
Paul Glezen
IT Specialist
Software Services
818 539 3321
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
