Maurizio,
Just saw the UML diagram. It looks pretty accurate. Thank you for taking the time to
represent the log4j architecture in UML.
You say that your intention is to refactor in order to obtain a clean design.
Although improvements are always welcome, your description suggests that the current
design is not clean. What makes you think that? Cheers, Ceki
At 22:33 18.04.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello Amar,
> here is the first version :
>http://web.tiscalinet.it/mtavern/diagram.htm
>Tell me about.
>
>Maurizio
>
>
>----------
>Da: Amarnath P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>A: LOG4J Developers Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Oggetto: RE: Refactoring
>Data: mercoledì 18 aprile 2001 8.01
>
>hi,
> hi i'm also in the same area that , doing UML Specs. for Log4j... send me
>the detials
>to me, so that i can be in part of the prepartions, and which is helpful to
>continue...
>
>
>cheers,
>amar.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Maurizio Taverna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:17 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Refactoring
>
>
>Hello ,
> I'm actually working with Log4j and I'm doing a UML class diagram of
>the
>version 1.0.4.
>I would like to know if is interesting to speak about some refactoring
>activities to make the design more clean.
>
>Contact me if interested
>
>Thank you
>
>Maurizio Taverna
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki Gülcü
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
