Sebastien,
Suppose you had this feature today, what would you do with it? Seriously, can you
please briefly describe a usage case? Merci d'avance, Ceki
At 08:00 19.04.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi paul
>
>>You don't have to use class or package names for your Categories. While it
>>is a useful convention in the absence of anything else, I have always used
>>component names for my category names rather than the names of individual
>>classes. In this way it is easy to control logging on the component level.
>
>Yes but if a component is shared by many users (~component) ? Furthermore we
>don't already know at the development, the using of a component. I think the
>concept of multilple inheritance is interesting. This property allow to
>have an initial name (a package name or a component name) and other names for
>the different using (at the same time).
>
>Seb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
