At 09:30 12.06.2001 -0500, Jim Moore wrote:
>At JavaOne they made a big deal out of the influence of Log4j on the new
>logging API (though they didn't mention names, and they said it is an IBM
>project). I think they did that to get the Log4j people to stop bothering
>them about the lack of pluggablity, but... :-)
>
>-Jim Moore
Hi Jim,
Chris Barlock of Tivoli, a wholly-owned subsidiary of IBM, contributed pages and pages
of comments to the JSR47 process. Chris is the author of IBM's logging toolkit for
Java. The least Sun could do is to give IBM and indirectly Chris credit.
However, referring to log4j as IBM's logging project is like referring to the Republic
of Ireland as a province of Great Britain. :-)
Cheers, Ceki
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:22 AM
>To: LOG4J Developers Mailing List
>Subject: Re: Comments on JSR47
>
>...
>
>In the past, I have tried to convince Graham Hamilton (the JSR47 lead). Why
>do you think JSR47 has a named hierarchy? :-) Do you think I got any credit
>for it? :-(
>
>...
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki Gülcü
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
