On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
| >*You* changed the whole package name from org.log4j to org.apahce.log4j
| >without lifting a eyebrow. But doing this Category->Logger move which is
| >such a much more intuitive change you wont do.. Hmm..
|
| Is this a provocation? Wishing you a good weekend, Ceki
No, not really. I just find the name Category not very intuitive. And
doing the org.log4j - org.apache.log4j move was no big hassle,
apparently, while aligning towards the java.logging API apparently is
very difficult.
You are definately doing one really good job with this logging pacakge,
Ceki, but I just got a bit weirded out by your "It stays this way, and
that's it" message. Not very open, was it?
Have a real good rest of the weekend you too,
Endre
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
