Georg,
Thanks for the clarification. As you know, the patch has been applied already. The development list is reserved for patches and actual code. The user list is the place to ask for help. It is sometimes hard to decide. The no-crossposting rule still applies tough. Anyway, I wouldn't worry about it. Thanks again, Ceki At 13:16 16.11.2001 +0100, you wrote: >Hi! > >Thanks for your reply. I guess didn't give too much a reason to why this >is a problem for me and our software project. Our project has a central >properties file consisting of two parts, a default part with general >properties (located in the jar) and specified part sent with execution >of the program. Most of the Log4J properties used in our system will be >in the default properties, and ignored by Log4J 1.1.3. I'm sending our >properties object to the PropertyConfigurator.configure(Properties) >method, >which in turn calls the "buggy" PropertySetter.setProperties(...) >method. > >Hope this helps to understand why this was a problem for me. :) And >thanks >for applying the patch. > >-- >Georg Lundesgaard >enonic.com > >PS: I was unsure of which list to post to, the "Contant us"-page said I >should post to the user list, but something told me (a hunch?:) that I >should send it to the dev list. Sorry for making too much of a noise. :) > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ceki Gulcu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 16. november 2001 13:05 >To: Log4J Developers List >Subject: Re: BUG: PropertySetter ignores default properties in the >java.util.Properties object sent to setProperties(java.util.Properties, >String) > > > >Your patch seems very reasonable. However, I wonder under what >circumstances in really makes a difference. I don't think the default >properties for the propperties parameter are set anywhere in log4j >code before invoking PropertySetter.setProperties(Properties, String). >Are you setting the default properties yourself? Regards, Ceki > >ps: I will apply your patch even tough I don't see its utility but >it can't do harm. > >By the way, avoid cross posting to multiple mailing lists. > >At 11:55 16.11.2001 +0100, Georg Lundesgaard wrote: >[snip] - bug description > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
