Hi Kevin,

As mentioned previously, I believe the bug to be fixed. Regards, Ceki

At 06:09 03.01.2002 -0800, you wrote:
>That I know of several different fixes for this bug have been suggested/posted/etc -- 
>though I haven't looked at the ones other than mine.
>
>This bug has been around for a long time now, and numerous people have complained 
>about it.  It would be very nice if the commiters (hint Ceki) would make some 
>decision about an official fix.  I'd even be willing to do a little comparison 
>summary to help that along.
>
>Kevin
>
>
>Jon Skeet wrote:
>
>> > I've also patched the log4j DayliRollingFileAppender class to have the
>> > expected behaviour: can i post this patch here so the
>> > development team can take it a look?
>>
>> Before doing so, you might want to see how it differs from the other class that I 
>submitted a while ago - DatedFileAppender - which is in the mailing list archives 
>(but hasn't been accepted yet). It's somewhat different in approach from 
>DailyRollingAppender, and does what I consider a more robust (and simple) job, but 
>has the flaw that the files will *always* be dated, rather than there being a 
>"current" file and archive files. Mixed blessings here.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to