> Other Jakarta projects do not have a separate cvs > list. Ant does (even though it's not listed), Avalon does - others may do too.
> For the sake of uniformity, I would like to get > rid of the log4j-cvs mailing list and fold it into > log4j-dev. > > This will increase the traffic on the dev list. > However, I think all log4j developers should get cvs > updates. > > As such, log4j-cvs subscribers are kindly requested to > also subscribe to log4j-dev list if they have not done > so already. > > Are there any objections to this move? Thanks, Ceki I'd rather not - it's currently extremely easy to filter things appropriately based on the "To" field. I don't think there's any need to not have a CVS list (especially as the uniformity argument at least isn't universal). 1 vote for keeping things the way they are... Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
