Well, it's rather important because otherwise log4j does not compile not run under JDK 1.1.x. Since the JDBCAppender is now (or will be) part of the official distribution it kind of important that the whole shebang compiles under JDK 1.1.x. Wouldn't you think?
At 15:22 25.03.2002 -0800, you wrote: >I suppose that's possible, according to Sun however, ArrayList is preferred >(and faster). >How important is it? > >Kevin > >Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > > Kevin, > > > > Is it possible to use Vector instead of ArrayList in order to > > keep JDK 1.1 compatibility? > > > > -- > > Ceki > > > > My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/ > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Ceki My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
