Hi Jason, At 10:51 31.03.2002 -0500, you wrote: >Hi, > >As part of testing Maven (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/maven/) with >various Jakarta projects I took a first stab at generating the >documentation for log4j with Maven. The results are here: > >http://24.157.133.102/log4j/
I very much like the new look. >I need to fix the logo and Ceki I apologize for the appearance of your >name I need to fix something in the xml mechanism. But you can see that >there a lot of documents that Maven produces so that you don't have to >bother with much other then your project specific documentation. There >is a Maven Documentation section on the bottom left where all the Maven >generated docs live. No problem regarding the appearance of my name. My name is already a test case for the existing anakia-based system for building the jakarta web site. I guess it is better to be a test case rather than a basket case. You are surely aware that the generated docs are incomplete but obviously that could be corrected. >At any rate, a maven build system can exist in parallel with what you >currently have and I would be glad to work with the log4j group to move >toward a maven-based system if you are interested. I'm interested >because I use log4j heavily and would like to try to help the whole >log4j development process with Maven if I can. In principle, I am favorable to move the log4j site to Maven. As I explained in our previous exchange, given the upcoming log4j 1.2 release in the next few weeks I do not have time to spare on non critical items. However, perhaps some other log4j developer might rise to the challenge. Whoever that person is, he (as far as I know we do not have female developers) would be lucky to work with you. -- Ceki My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
