Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> 
> At 12:00 11.06.2002 +0100, you wrote:
> >Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> > >
> > > Sigh.
> > >
> >
> >And what exactly do you mean by that !?!
> 
> This is from your initial post:
> 
>    Modify all previous and current versions of log4j to support that
>    API. This may take a little while but it will allow new code and
>    old code to coexist.
> 
> I sigh because in log4j 1.2 already ensures backward
> compatibility. Moreover, this was done at the cost of not little but
> a lot of work.
> 

While 1.2 may be backwardly compatible with 1.1 (as far as the API that
I need is concerned) whatever release you remove Category in will
immediately break backward compatability.

While we are on the subject why was Category deprecated and replaced
with Logger. I looked in the FAQ a while ago but could not find it
and a previous question went unanswered but maybe if you have the time
you could enlighten me.

-- 
This message may contain confidential information and will be protected
by copyright. If this email isn't for you then we'd be grateful if you
could notify Volantis by return and delete it. You should not copy,
disclose or distribute any of its contents.

Any reply may be read by the recipient to whom you send it and others
within Volantis Systems Ltd.

Although we aim to use efficient virus checking procedures we accept no
liability for viruses and recipients should use their own virus checking
procedures.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to