Hi Oscar,
Thanks for you offer for help. It is much appreciated. I have asked on several occasions for volunteers to work on log4j's JMX support. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102391042300002&r=1&w=2 The current JMX support in log4j requires testing and better documentation but it contains some imho good ideas nonetheless. For example, in can manage any appender or layout, even those that are not part of log4j. If you find the code too cryptic, then I can write a short functional spec to explain things more clearly. Just let me know. (If you think the existing JMX code is a pile of crap don't hesitate say so.) At 09:51 21.06.2002 +0200, you wrote: >Hello, > >I had been using log4j for a while now, and I will like to collaborate with >the development, currently I am working with a telco in Germany and have 2+ >yrs of real java expirience. > >I will be interested in helping with "Multiple implementations of Logger" I >already done something similar that allows to replace the Logger impl, using >log4j, or jdk 1.4 or even a nulllogger. I also made some instrumentation >layer for the logging using JMX and it will be nice to see a couple of those >ideas incorporated into the log4j distro ;-) > >regards, > >Oscar Forero -- Ceki -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
