Yes, I'd be willing to take it on. I'll try to get started on it tonight and let you know if I run into anything unexpected.
-Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:25 AM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: Merging 1.2.X into the main branch > > > > I am busy with other things for the moment. Would you want to do it? > > At 22:52 25.09.2002 -0700, you wrote: > >I don't mean to harp, but are we going to do this soon? I > don't know if > >Mike McAngus is still on this list, but we were waiting for > a merge before > >committing his changes. Maybe we should wait a bit longer. > I know merging > >is a pain. > > > >just wondering, > >thanks, > >-Mark > > -- > Ceki > > TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be > conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from > others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793 > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
