Agree. The fastest way of doing something is not to do it all. (Like to think that way regarding washing the dishes, cleaning the house, buy groceries... ;o) )
On Friday 04 October 2002 10:43, Bauman, Nick wrote: > Damn decimal point cadswallop. On your bike, Nick! :) :) :) > > But the point remains "less is more". We opened up the doors one day on an > app that was logging 13 pages per second. We got it down to something like > 2 lines an hour. A lot more when things got wonky, as we needed it. > -----Original Message----- > From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thu 10/3/2002 9:16 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Cc: > Subject: Re: Proposed architecture changes to log4j for improved memory > usage > > > On Friday 04 October 2002 06:58, Bauman, Nick wrote: > > > Chris, your input is very helpful. > > > > You say that per day, you're logging ~1 GB. What is that, something > > like, 1.15 MB per second? Isn't that too much? > > > You just failed your 3rd grade math exam ;o) > > 1,000,000,000 per day / 24 hours = ~42 MB per hour > ~42MB per hour / 3600 sec per hour = ~11kB per second. > > IMHO, not a h**l of lot of data. Many websites exceeds that by just > taking down ~150 char per request. > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
