Wow, Ceki.  A whirlwind!  I was going to do it, but was waiting for
1.2.7...and then you went and did it all!

thanks!
-Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ceki Gulcu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 3:53 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: Merge of the 1.2 branch with the 1.3 branch
>
>
>
> The commit of 1.2branch with the trunk. Things seem to have went
> relatively well. Conflicts were quickly resolved. The resulting code
> builds and passes all existing tests.
>
> I am calling it a day.
>
> At 00:05 10.10.2002 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >As I am about to attempt to merge the 1.2 branch with the 1.3 (main)
> >branch I would like to ask all log4j committers to please
> suspend all cvs
> >commits for the time being. I'll keep you posted.
>
>
> --
> Ceki
>
> TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
> conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
> others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to