Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 15:37 20.01.2003 +0100, Alexander Erk wrote:Hello dear log4j developers,
I've modified the log4jME source in a form that it is in the line with the log4j stuff.
This means an application can do:
static Logger myLogger = Logger.getLogger("foo.bar.FooBar");
BTW: I've modified the Hierarchy class with:
public Logger getInstance (String name){
I think the preferred form is public Logger getLogger(String name)
Sorry, of course that's they way I 've done it.
First I've tried to refactor the Category into Logger, which worked fine, but then I saw that I also have to change it from.. .. .. } And added a new Logger class extended from Category.
Given that log4jMini's primary goal is reduced size, I would simply drop the Category class and use Logger instead.
public Logger getInstance (String name)
also to
public Logger getLogger(String name)
and in order to keep up backwards compatibility I decided to extend org.apache.log4j.Category and modify org.apache.log4j.Hierarchy
Should I sent you a patch or the complete modified log4jME code. What to you suggest ?
Please do.-- Alexander Erk, Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Institut fuer Rundfunktechnik GmbH Diensteentwicklung und Medieninfrastruktur Floriansmuehlstr. 60 80939 Muenchen, Germany Tel: +49 (0)89 32399- 282 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49 (0)89 32399- 200 web: www.irt.de-- Ceki -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-- Alexander Erk, Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Institut fuer Rundfunktechnik GmbH Diensteentwicklung und Medieninfrastruktur Floriansmuehlstr. 60 80939 Muenchen, Germany Tel: +49 (0)89 32399- 282 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49 (0)89 32399- 200 web: www.irt.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
