The PropertyConfigurator does not depend on the order of directives in the property file. Why should an non-existent restriction be introduced?
By the way, the DOMConfigurator part of log4j.dtd might disappear in the future as DOMConfigurator might be allowing things so rich that cannot be expressed in a DTD.
At 09:57 12.02.2003 -0500, you wrote:
Why not follow the (implied) order that the XML DOMConfigurator follows, as determined by the associated DTD? If nothing else, it would establish a consistency if ordering/dependency issues come to light.--
-d
At 02:08 PM 2/11/2003 -0800, Mark Womack wrote:
It would be nice if the properties were sorted by name in the resulting file. Then the related properties would be grouped together. :-)-Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Bair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:49 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: RE: Property Config order independent? > > > Ya, I checked out the PropertyConfigurator source. It loads the > properties into a Properties object via the load method, > which suggests > as well that order isn't important. Also, a quick test seemed to > confirm it as well. > > Thanks, > Richard > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 14:39, Mark Womack wrote: > > You should look at the PropertyConfigurator source to be sure. > > > > -Mark > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Richard Bair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:25 PM > > > To: Log4J Developers List > > > Subject: Property Config order independent? > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > I'm working on that log4j configuration gui, and am using the > > > java.util.Properties class for reading the standard > properties style > > > log4j config file. When the Properties class stores its data > > > back into > > > a file, it does so in a different order than the original > file. Does > > > this matter? I am under the impression that the order in > the file is > > > unimportant, but since I've only ever used the xml > > > configuration files, > > > I'm not 100% certain on this. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ donald h. larmee [EMAIL PROTECTED] 804.301.UTOP utopian software concepts, inc. www.utopiansoft.com +-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ceki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
