Hi,

To answer your questions:

1. Yes, this is desired behaviour. The intention is to allow different
   different logs to be analysed at the same time. Very useful when
   trying to analyse a distributed application.

2. I would prefer to set them globally. I would rather wait to see if
   the required complexity to implement them a per file basis is
   really required. I can see a lot of confusion to the users if they are
   not global.

Please send the diffs to me. I'll be happy to review and commit them.

Cheers,
Oliver

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond DeCampo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2003 11:07
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Chainsaw and multiple files
>
>
> All,
>
> I noticed that when you load multiple files with chainsaw that the
> effect is cumulative, i.e., logging events from all the files are
> simultaneously loaded.  I am in the process of creating a recent files
> menu and I was going to save the state of the filters for each file.
> However, given the current behavior, that doesn't seem to fit.  So:
>
> 1.  Is this the desired behavior?
> 2.  Assuming it is, does it make sense to store the state of the filters
> on a per file basis?  I.e., I was going to reset the values of the
> filters when you load a file you have loaded previously to the values
> you previously had.  Alternatively, I could just save the filter values
> globally.
>
> I should have something to submit this weekend (including saving column
> widths, a recent files menu, perhaps even column visibility and order).
>   Who should I send the diffs to?
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to