> Are they any objections if I upgrade the Log4J build.xml to
> use it?
That would be cool.
Inidicently, I think my cause isn't the lack of finding the jar, as I've
found the checkstyle target under -verbose setting and get this:
checkstyle:
[taskdef] Loading definitions from resource checkstyletask.properties
BUILD FAILED
file:c:/Jakarta/jakarta-log4j/build.xml:327: Must specify 'config'.
at
com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.CheckStyleTask.execute(CheckStyleTask.java:2
26)
at
org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:193)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:341)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:309)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:336)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1339)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1255)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:609)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.start(Main.java:196)
at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.main(Main.java:235)
It's inside Checkstyle at this point, so must have found the class.
Anyways, if someone can just send me the Checkstyle error report where
Chainsaw isn't complying I'll just go off that and conform to that style.
thanks,
Paul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
