+1 - a fully functioning JDBC appender is a worthy if not critical member of log4j.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Womack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2003 7:52 AM > To: Log4j-Dev (E-mail) > Subject: [VOTE] Sandbox Committer - Raymond DeCampo > > > Raymond DeCampo has been active in the discussions about jdbc > appenders in > log4j and has submitted some interesting code for inclusion in the > log4j-sandbox. > > I propose that we grant Raymond committer access to the > sandbox cvs so that > he can continue this work unhindered by waiting for others to commit > changes. There isn't a lot of traffic on the jdbc topic, but > there does > seem to be a fair amount of interest on the dev and user lists. > > My vote: +1 > > -Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
