Tagging is an excellent idea. But please, no branches!
At 08:47 AM 6/25/2003 +1000, you wrote:
Okay! :)
Is it worth deleting the existing Chainsaw package contents and replacing this? Should we tag the repo first just prior?
cheers,
Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2003 8:45 AM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: Chainsaw out of sandbox? > > > > I can't imagine any reason why it should stay in the sandbox > and not move > to log4j-proper. > > At 07:57 AM 6/25/2003 +1000, you wrote: > >Okay, should we move Chainsaw v2 should move out of the > sandbox? Or is that > >too early? (I'm fine with it still in the sandbox). > > > >cheers, > > > >_________________________ > >Paul Smith > >Lawlex Compliance Solutions > >phone: +61 3 9278 1511 > >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual" > ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
