> Thanks for all the great work on log4j. I hope this > little contribution saves time at some point (as I'm > sure this things will get ironed out eventually), and > apologise in advance if I've sent this to the wrong > list.
Nope, this is the right list. Thanks. > I had to make a few small changes to get log4j to > build, as indicated in the attached patch file. I > checked between the 1.3.1/1.4.1 javadoc and I can > confirm that all the changes are merely cases of new > 1.4.1 APIs being used instead of their 1.3.1 > alternatives. I cross checked Tim's analysis, and he's very much correct. (Personally surprised the Boolean.valueOf was not in 1.3 or earlier) Thanks for keeping us in check. Patch applied. cheers, Paul Smith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
